Ten years ago, a plane crash occurred in the skies over Germany, which killed 52 children and 19 adults - passengers and crew of a Tu-154 and a cargo Boeing-757, which collided as a result of a mistake by Swiss air traffic controllers.
On the night of July 1-2, 2002 in Germany in the area of Lake Constance, a Russian passenger airliner Tu-154 of the Bashkir Airlines company, operating a charter flight from Moscow to Barcelona (Spain), and a Boeing-757 cargo plane of the international air transportation company DHL, flying from Bergamo (Italy) to Brussels (Belgium). On board the Tu-154 were 12 crew members and 57 passengers - 52 children and five adults. Most of the children were sent on vacation to Spain as a reward for excellent studies by the UNESCO Committee of Bashkiria. By a tragic accident, on the plane - Svetlana Kaloeva with 10-year-old Kostya and 4-year-old Diana, who flew to her husband, Vitaly Kaloev, in Spain, where he worked under a contract. The cargo Boeing was flown by two pilots.
From the collision, the Tu-154 fell apart in the air into several parts that fell in the vicinity of the German city of Überlingen.
The crash resulted in 52 children and 19 adults.
The tragedy occurred a few minutes after German air traffic controllers handed over escort of the Russian aircraft to Swiss colleagues from the SkyGuide air control center operating at one of the largest European airports, Zurich-Kloten (Switzerland).
That night, at the Skyguide air traffic control center, there was one controller on duty instead of the usual two - Peter Nielsen. He gave the Tu-154 crew a command to descend when the approaching aircraft could no longer occupy safe echelons.
The main equipment for telephone communication and automatic notification of the personnel of the center about the dangerous approach of aircraft was turned off. The main and backup telephone lines were not working. The dispatcher from the German city of Karlsruhe, who noticed the dangerous approach of the planes, tried 11 times to get through - and to no avail.
After the plane crash, Nielsen was suspended from work, and the Swiss investigating authorities launched a criminal investigation against Skyguide and its management.
February 24, 2004 Peter Nielsen in the Zurich suburb of Kloten by a Russian citizen Vitaly Kaloev, who lost his entire family in a plane crash over Lake Constance - his wife, daughter and son. On this day, Kaloev came to the dispatcher's house to show him photographs of his dead wife and children, but Nielsen pushed him away, and the photographs fell to the ground, which led to the loss of control over the grief-stricken man.
In October 2005, Kaloev was convicted of the murder and. In November 2007, he was released early and returned to his homeland, North Ossetia. In 2008, Vitaliy Kaloev in construction and architecture of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania.
Immediately after the disaster, the Swiss company Skyguide put all the blame on the Russian pilots, who, in their opinion, did not understand the instructions of the controller in English well.
In May 2004, the German Federal Aviation Accident Investigation Office issued a report on the results of the crash investigation.
Experts acknowledged that in the collision of a Tu-154 passenger airliner of Bashkir Airlines with a cargo Boeing from Skyguide.
The control center in Zurich did not notice in time the danger of two planes colliding at the same echelon. The crew of the Russian Tu-154 carried out the dispatcher's command to descend, despite the fact that the on-board flight safety system TIKAS required an urgent climb.
Only after the publication of the report, Skyguide admitted its mistakes and, two years after the disaster, its director Alain Rossier apologized to the families of the victims. On May 19, 2004, Swiss President Joseph Deiss sent an official letter of apology to Russian President Vladimir Putin for the plane crash over Lake Constance.
In December 2006, Skyguide director Alain Rossier.
In September 2007, the district court in Bülach, Switzerland, found four employees of the Skyguide air traffic control service guilty of criminal negligence that led to a plane crash over Lake Constance. In total, eight employees of the Swiss company appeared before the court. Defendants, shifting it to the murdered dispatcher Peter Nielsen.
Four Skyguide managers in manslaughter. Three of them were sentenced to probation, one to a fine. Four other defendants are acquitted.
The Skyguide company offered the families of the victims of the disaster certain compensation, provided that their claim was not considered in one of the US courts. Some of the families did not agree with this proposal, and at a meeting of the committee of parents of dead children in June 2004 in Ufa, in which 29 people took part, there was, including the payment of compensation, in court.
On July 1, 2004, it became known that lawsuits were filed in the US and Spanish courts against the Swiss air traffic control service Skyguide, who lost their relatives in a plane crash over Lake Constance.
In February 2010, the Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland opened a memorial complex dedicated to the victims of the crash.
In 2004, at the scene of a tragedy in the German city of Überlingen in a plane crash, which is a torn necklace, the pearls of which scattered along the trajectory of the wreckage of two aircraft.
In 2006, in Zurich, opposite the Skyguide building, there was a spiral, on which 72 candles were installed in memory of 71 victims of a plane crash and a killed air traffic controller.
The material was prepared on the basis of information from RIA Novosti and open sources
Collision of two planes
Pilot and air traffic controller error
Near the city of Überlingen,
47.778333 , 9.173889
Computer modulation of disaster
Collision over Lake Constance- an aviation accident that occurred on July 1, 2002, when the Tu-154M aircraft, performing Flight 2937 of Bashkir Airlines, collided in the air with a Boeing-757, DHL flight 611. The collision took place near the city of Überlingen, near Lake Constance (). The crash claimed the lives of everyone on board both aircraft (71 people, including 52 children).
Previous events
Tu-154M "Bashkir Airlines", tail number RA-85816, followed the route Moscow - Barcelona. On board were 12 crew members and 57 passengers, including 52 children who flew on vacation to Spain. This trip was organized by the Committee for UNESCO of Bashkiria as an encouragement for good studies.
The group had missed their flight the day before. Bashkir Airlines, at the request of the travel companies involved in the trip, urgently organized an additional flight. Other late passengers were also offered to board it, in total 8 tickets were sold for the flight.
Skyguide's management tolerated for several years only one controller in control of air traffic at night when his partner was resting, and did not provide enough personnel to change this practice. In addition, on the night of the collision, the equipment that alerts the controller to the danger of a collision between aircraft was turned off for maintenance. Phones were also turned off. Because of this, Nielsen, at a critical moment, was unable to agree with Friedrichshafen Airport, so that they would take care of the plane arriving with a delay, which he followed from another terminal. For the same reason, the dispatchers in Karlsruhe, who saw the dangerous approach of the aircraft, could not warn Nielsen about this.
The Commission also noted that the ICAO documents governing the use of TCAS and, as a result, the documents that guided the Tu-154 crew were incomplete and partially contradictory. Although, on the one hand, they contained a direct prohibition of performing maneuvers that contradicted TCAS prompts, on the other hand, this system was called auxiliary, which could give the impression that the controller's instructions take precedence.
Prior to this disaster, there were several dangerous close encounters due to the fact that the crew of one aircraft followed the TCAS prompts, while the crew of the other made maneuvers contrary to them. However, the necessary clarifications were not published until after the disaster.
Dispatcher murder
Monument to the victims of the plane crash and Peter Nielsen at the Skyguide office
The air traffic controller who controlled the colliding planes was killed on the threshold of his house on February 24, 2004. Vitaly Kaloev was arrested on suspicion of murder, having lost his wife and two children in the crash. Kaloev stated that he showed Nielsen photographs of the children and wanted Nielsen to apologize to him for what had happened. Nielsen hit Kaloev's hand, knocking out the photos. According to Vitaly Kaloev, he does not remember what happened after that. On October 26, 2005, he was found guilty of murder and sentenced to eight years in prison.
Skyguide Trial
In May 2006, a lawsuit began on charges against eight employees of the company. The final decision was made in September 2007. Four of Skyguide's managers were found guilty of manslaughter. Three of them were sentenced to probation, one to a fine. Four other defendants are acquitted .
The memory of the dead
Monument "Die zerrissene Perlenkette"
At the site of a plane crash near the city of Überlingen, a monument "Die zerrissene Perlenkette" ("Broken string of pearls") was erected.
Everything was like that. On July 1, 2002, a Tu-154M aircraft flying from Moscow to Barcelona collided in the air with another aircraft, a cargo Boeing 757-200PF, flying from Bergamo to Brussels). Nobody survived. The Boeing had two pilots. The Tu-154M was flying 60 passengers, most of whom were children - they went to Spain to rest. The collision took place near Lake Constance.
There were several reasons for the disaster: improper operation of the equipment, incorrect assessment of the situation by the air traffic controller, interruptions in communication with the dispatcher - a number of circumstances that ultimately led to the death of people. Relatives of the victims were compensated, and the disaster began to be forgotten. But a year and a half later they remembered her again. Air traffic controller Peter Nielsen was killed on the threshold of his house right in front of his wife and children, he was stabbed several times. The killer turned out to be a Russian citizen, Ossetian architect Vitaly Kaloev. In 2002, he had already worked in Spain for a long time and was waiting for his wife and two children to visit. They managed to get on the Tu-154M at the last moment, there were empty seats there by chance.
The film "The Boden trap. Death over the lake
When Kaloev learned about the disaster, he immediately went to the place where the wreckage fell. He was allowed to search, and he managed to find first the beads of his daughter, and then her body. As he told the investigation, he came to Nielsen with only one purpose: to show a photograph of the dead and ask the dispatcher to apologize for his mistake. Nielsen, in anger, knocked the photo out of Kaloev's hands, and what happened next, Kaloev no longer remembers.
After two years in prison (the sentence was eight years), Vitaly Kaloev was released early. He returned to Russia, where he was appointed Deputy Minister of Architecture and Construction Policy of North Ossetia, worked until 2016 and retired. He was awarded the medal "For the Glory of Ossetia".
TV program "Live" about Vitaly Kaloev
The film took the events of 2002-2004. as a basis, but much, of course, has been changed. So, the crash site, as well as the entire action of the film, was moved to the United States. Vitaliy Kaloev "turned" into Roman Melnik (), who lives and works in America. His wife flies to him with her daughter, although she is pregnant, so the monument on the grave will also be for the three dead. And the miller finds the beads of his daughter, and the daughter herself. And he also does not find a place for himself in search of the culprit of the disaster, marveling at how company representatives offer him compensation instead of simply sincerely expressing condolences and asking for forgiveness. And he goes to the dispatcher with a knife, although the dispatcher here is not a Dane, but an ordinary American Jake Bonanos, and he has not three children, but one little son. Melnik spends much more time in prison. These are not just cosmetic changes, but important details for the development of the plot, which the authors conceived. The plot, which in reality was completely different precisely because the variables in this formula are different.
Trailer of the movie "Consequences"
In general, the most important thing in this film, the plot and ending of which are known in advance, is its tonality. Like the best classical tragedies, it is decided as a tale of fate that leads two people to each other, although they do not know it themselves. Arnold Schwarzenegger plays a "simple guy", laconic, handy, ingenuous. An elderly man who was happy because he was supposed to become a grandfather, and suddenly he was left completely alone, without loved ones, without a goal. Orphaned. And anger slowly boiled up in him.
But perhaps more important is the figure of Jake Bonanos, the dispatcher, who is played by a dramatic actor in this picture. His Jake is the victim. He is told that he is not to blame for what happened, but in all the eyes turned on him, he reads the accusation. He himself is sure that so many people died because of him, so he does not wash off the inscription “murderer”, which one of the neighbors painted on the facade of his house. McNairy leads his hero through every stage of desperation, to the point of attempting suicide, but we know that he is destined to die in a different way. Not when he is ready to die, but when he suddenly has a hope that he can still live. When he gets out of the abyss of despondency and starts a new life, fate will overtake him in the face of Melnik, but this, oddly enough, will not be the end of the story.
English-language trailer of the film "Consequences"
The tragedy over Lake Constance inspired the largest Russian screenwriter much earlier to create his own story, which he himself decided to stage as a directorial debut. The film was released in 2007, and it was a genuine psychological (even to some extent psychedelic) thriller, but familiar details were immediately guessed here. Of course, Mindadze was not talking about Kaloev, but about something deep, important that sits inside each of us, which is why, perhaps, the film is perceived not so much by the mind as by the subconscious. Many heroes have no names, they are simply carried by the whirlwind of history, tossed from side to side, and they rush without asking questions and without choosing a specific target. You need to do something - they do: several people are driving in one car, and each of them had someone in the crashed plane, everyone here is in an ongoing state of passion, and anything is possible.
The dispatcher will be strangled here, not stabbed to death, and no one will get anything for it. Even the identity of the killer will be in question - does it matter who was able to get to the person who is not guilty, because the partner went to bed and the equipment did not work. There is no Lake Constance here, it is all the southern Russian hinterland, and the plane flew to more prosaic Egypt, the heroes are all Russian, but the horror of what is happening, its uncontrollability, its naturalness and unnaturalness at the same time, Mindadze conveyed scrupulously and deeply.
Now work is underway on a new picture about Vitaly Kaloev and a plane crash, and this time, apparently, the names of the heroes will correspond to the true participants in the events: the second name of the film “Unforgiven” is “Kaloev”. Vitaliy Kaloev read and approved the script written by Andreasyan, and approved for his role in the film. The actor will specifically grow a beard and lose weight to create an image. Also in the film, as the authors say, they will play, and. In the script of the picture, special attention is paid to the depiction of Kaloev's family life before the tragedy, and these images make his state both immediately after the disaster and at the moment of meeting with the dispatcher understandable. Events are shown from the point of view of Kaloev, and if he does not see something, we do not see it either.
The exact release date of the film has not yet been announced, it received state support for production, and the release was planned for the fall of 2017.
Mikhailov Andrey 07/02/2012 at 7:00
On July 2, 2002, a Tu-154M of the Bashkir Airlines and a Boeing-757 transport aircraft of an American postal airline collided in the sky over Germany. 71 people died, including 52 children. The dispatching services of Switzerland were guilty of a terrible catastrophe. Vitaliy Kaloev avenged the death of his family by killing the Skyguide controller.
10 years ago, on July 2, 2002, a Tu-154M of the Russian company Bashkir Airlines and a Boeing-757 transport aircraft of an American postal airline collided in the sky over Germany. 71 people died, including 52 children. The ground control services of Switzerland were responsible for the terrible disaster.
I still remember that this plane crash shocked not only Europe, but the whole world. Still - 26,000 passenger and cargo liners fly every day over Europe, and about four thousand over Switzerland. This disaster has raised many questions about the safety of air travel over the Old World. There was a lot of this mystical and incomprehensible in it ...
On the night of Monday to Tuesday, July 2, 2002, in the sky over southern Germany at an altitude of 12,000 meters, a Tu-154 of the Bashkir Airlines flying from Moscow to Barcelona collided with a cargo Boeing-757 of an American postal company en route from Bahrain to Brussels. There were 69 people on board the Russian airliner, including 12 crew members and 57 passengers, most of them were children flying to Spain from Bashkiria on vacation. By the way, the catastrophe, in a very mystical way, occurred exactly one year after the tragic death of the Tu-154 near Irkutsk.
In hot pursuit, the German authorities placed the blame for the collision on the pilot of the Russian airliner. A representative of the Swiss air traffic control service "Skyguide" then famously reported that the cars were on a collision course, and the Tu-154 pilot only for the third time reacted to the instructions of the dispatchers to start an emergency descent.
Then the dispatcher warned the pilot of a Boeing 757 flying on a collision course about a dangerous approach to the Russian aircraft. But the truck pilot did not have time to react. In general, the Russians did not speak English well, and the equipment on the Tu-154, reporting a dangerous approach, was probably outdated. According to another German version, the Tu-154 crew did not have time to switch to the desired frequency and simply did not hear commands from the ground.
However, according to the "domestic" version, the crew of the Russian plane was very experienced and would not have made such a gross mistake. Our aircraft was in operation for only seven years, which, by aviation standards, is quite short. The liner was completely serviceable.
The Russian side, immediately after the statement of the Germans and the Swiss, took a rather calm and balanced position, feeling the force of facts behind them. Indeed, at the time of the collision between the Tu-154 and the Boeing-757, it was the ground air traffic controllers who led them!
Very soon, it became clear even to foreign parties that the disaster could not have done without the errors of the dispatchers. Moreover, if not confusion, then at least some uncertainty reigned in the dispatching services of Switzerland. Literally a day before the death of the Tu-154 over southern Germany, the head of the Swiss air traffic control service "Skyguide" admitted the inevitability of a catastrophe in the airspace entrusted to him, since the air traffic control company is on the verge of bankruptcy. No more, no less!
The problem of "staff demotivation" arises. Simply put, the dispatchers have nothing to pay, the means of technical control are hopelessly outdated. All this, of course, can affect flight safety. Note - this was announced by the Swiss side just a day before the disaster!
Then the Swiss were forced to admit that a few hours before the collision in the control center of the Zurich Kloten airfield, the automatic warning system for air traffic controllers about the dangerous approach of aircraft was turned off for preventive work. Being notified of this, in these circumstances, the controllers should have paid special attention to the work of controlling the air situation in manual mode.
In addition, a gross violation of job descriptions was revealed in the work of the Swiss service. During such shutdowns, at least two dispatchers should be at the console. One was on duty, a certain Peter Nielsen, who allowed his partner to sleep - fortunately at the time of the disaster there were only five aircraft in their area of responsibility. In the end, there were problems even with the phone - the Swiss dispatcher could not contact his German colleagues for a long time.
The pilots of "Bashkir Airlines" until the last moment doubted the correctness of the dispatcher's commands, but, strictly following his instructions, continued to carry them out. And just 1.8 seconds before the collision, the Tu-154 pilot saw the rapidly approaching Boeing - but it was already impossible to do anything. Thanks to the surviving "black boxes", the specialists managed to restore the recordings of the conversations between the two crews and the dispatcher of the Swiss company "Skyguide".
Actually, it is from the printout of the negotiations between the crews and the dispatcher that it is absolutely clear that the latter's fault is beyond doubt. The Boeing and Tu-154 flew to the collision point for about 12 minutes at the same altitude - 36,000 feet. But even in the last 50 seconds, the catastrophe could have been prevented - if not for the confusion in the dispatcher's commands.
In the end, the Swiss also admitted that the Skyguide flight control system was working with a strong delay, and the controller took too long to figure out where to send the Russian plane ...
More than 13 years have passed since that memorable date when two airliners collided in the sky over Germany - the Russian passenger TU-154M and the Belgian cargo Boeing-757. The victims of this terrible disaster were 71 people, most of whom are children.
Events leading up to the flight
On that fateful night from July 1 to July 2, 2002, when the disaster occurred over Lake Constance, there were 67 passengers on board the Russian passenger plane TU-154, which belonged to the Bashkir Airlines, including 52 children and 12 crew members. The main part was made up of talented schoolchildren from Bashkiria who flew to Spain on vacation. Vouchers were provided by the UNESCO Committee of the Republic as an encouragement for high academic performance. And indeed, in this group, all the children were like a selection: artists, poets, athletes.
As it turned out later, the Ufa schoolchildren were not supposed to be in the sky on that ill-fated night at all. Simply by mistake, the adults accompanying them, who brought a group of Bashkir children to Sheremetyevo Airport, instead of delivering them to Domodedovo, they missed their plane flying to Barcelona the day before.
A series of accidents
Almost all children going on vacation abroad came from families of high-ranking parents. For example, 15-year-old Leysan Gimaeva was the daughter of the head of the presidential administration of the Bashkir Republic. If these were children from ordinary families, then they would simply return home, albeit upset, but alive, and over Lake Constance would not have happened.
But the influential parents of schoolchildren decided to send one of the aircraft belonging to Bashkir Airlines to Moscow for them, which was then supposed to deliver them to Spain on charter flight No. 2937. The crew of the plane was headed by Alexander Gross, who had already flown to Barcelona several times before and knew the route well.
And here is another accident - after the children got on the plane, it turned out that there were still a few empty seats. It was immediately decided to sell these extra tickets. There were only seven of them. Four of them went to the Shislovsky family from Belarus, who also missed their plane, and three went to Svetlana Kaloeva from North Ossetia, who flew with two children (eldest son Kostya and 4-year-old Diana) to her husband Vitaly, who worked in Spain under a contract. After the disaster over Lake Constance, even the names of these random passengers became known immediately.
Before the disaster
On that July night, both aircraft were in the skies over Germany, but despite this, air traffic control for that period was transferred to the Swiss company Skyguide, located in Zurich. In this center, as usual at night, only three people remained to work: two dispatchers and an assistant. However, almost before the collision, one of the people on duty left for a break, and only Peter Nielsen remained at the console, who was forced to monitor two terminals simultaneously. When the controller noticed that two planes, located at the same flight level of 36 thousand feet, began to approach, there were already a few seconds before the disaster. A collision over Lake Constance was almost inevitable.
Command Mismatch
The courses of aircraft flying towards each other must inevitably intersect. The controller tried to correct the situation and gave the command to the crew of the Russian liner to descend. I must say that by this time the TU-154 pilots had already noticed another vessel approaching them from the left side. They were ready to perform a maneuver that would allow the planes to disperse safely.
Immediately after the dispatcher's command, the automatic TCAS system came to life in the cockpit of the Russian pilots, which informed them that it was urgent to climb. And at the same time, on board the Boeing, the same instruction was received from an identical system, but only to descend. The co-pilot of the TU-154 aircraft drew the attention of the rest of the crew to the discrepancy between the commands of the dispatcher and TCAS, but he was told that they would follow the order received from the ground. That is why no one confirmed the order received from the dispatcher, although the ship began to decline. Just a few seconds later, the command from the ground was repeated. This time it was immediately confirmed.
Fatal mistake
As the investigation will later show, the collision over Lake Constance was due to an untimely command given by Skyguide dispatcher Peter Nielsen. By mistake, he gave the crew of the Russian plane incorrect information about another airliner, which is supposedly to their right.
Subsequently, decryption of the data showed that the pilots were misled by such a message and, apparently, decided that another aircraft was flying nearby, which the TCAS system for some reason did not detect. It remains unclear why none of the pilots informed about this contradiction in the commands of the dispatcher on duty.
Simultaneously with the Russian aircraft, the Boeing 757 was also descending, the crew of which was following the TCAS instructions. They immediately reported this maneuver to the ground, but the controller Peter Nielsen did not hear him, as another ship on a different frequency got in touch.
In the last moments before the crash, both crews tried as best they could to prevent a dangerous rendezvous by deflecting the controls to the stop, but, as you know, all efforts were in vain. The Tu-154M plane collided with the Boeing-757 almost at a right angle. The plane belonging to the transport company DHL, with its vertical stabilizer, dealt a powerful blow to the fuselage of the Russian airliner, which caused it to fall apart in the air. Its fragments fell in the vicinity of the German town of Überlingen, near Lake Constance (Baden-Württemberg). The Boeing, in turn, having lost its stabilizer and lost control, crashed. A terrible disaster over Lake Constance claimed the lives of the crew members of both aircraft and all the passengers flying on the Tu-154.
Investigation of what happened
According to the results of the crash, an investigation was carried out by a specially created commission under the German Federal Office (BFU). Her findings were published two years later. The commission's report gave two reasons for the collision:
- The air traffic controller failed to ensure proper separation between the two air liners in time. The descent instruction was handed over to the pilots of the Tu-154 crew late.
- The crew of the Russian aircraft continued to descend despite TCAS advice to climb.
Expert conclusions
The report also noted numerous mistakes made by the management of the center in Zurich and Tak, the owners of the Swiss company Skyguide for many years allowed such an air traffic controller work order in which only one person could control air traffic, while his partner at that time rested. (2002) made it clear that this number of staff was clearly not enough. In addition, the equipment, which was supposed to tell the dispatcher about the possible convergence of airliners, was turned off that night due to maintenance.
As for the phones, they didn't work either. It was because of this that Peter Nielsen could not at the right time get through to the airport located in Friedrichshafen (a small town located north of Lake Constance) in order to transfer control of the aircraft arriving with a delay to the controllers there, followed by the Swiss at the second terminal . In addition, due to the lack of telephone communications, the duty officers in Karlsruhe, who had noticed a dangerous approach in the air much earlier, were unable to warn Nielsen of the impending disaster.
Also, the commission that investigated the collision over Lake Constance noted that the ICAO documents governing the use of TCAS and held by the crew of the Tu-154 aircraft were somewhat contradictory and incomplete. The fact is that, on the one hand, the instruction to the system contained a strict prohibition on performing maneuvers that did not correspond to TCAS prompts, and on the other hand, it was considered auxiliary, thus creating the impression that the dispatcher's commands were priority. From this we can draw the only correct conclusion: if it were not for a series of ridiculous accidents and fatal mistakes, then the plane crash over Lake Constance (2002) would have been simply impossible.
Results
It didn't end with the plane crash. Unfortunate relatives buried their children, and some families after that broke up, unable to withstand such grief. Many lives were taken by the disaster over Lake Constance. The death toll initially contained the names of 19 adults and 52 children. But on February 24, 2004, another name was added to it - Peter Nielsen, the same Skyguide dispatcher who made a number of mistakes that led to such a large-scale tragedy. He was killed by Vitaly Kaloev, whose wife and children flew on that ill-fated flight number 2937. The trial in this case lasted almost a year. At the end of October 2005, Kaloev was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 8 years in prison. Considering the circumstances of the case and the severe mental state of the accused, the court reduced the term to 5 years and 3 months.
Near the German city of Überlingen, in the area of Lake Constance, an unusual monument has been erected, reminiscent of the tragedy more than 10 years ago. It is made in the form of a torn necklace, whose pearls scattered along the entire trajectory of the fall of the wreckage of two airliners.
